THE FUTURE OF FINANCE BLOG

What Bundy and His Merry Militia Can Learn From TransCanada

January 11, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-01-11 at 11.57.10 AM

Image Courtesy of Fortune.com

Ammon Bundy and his assault-rifle-packing militia took over the Malheur National Refuge in eastern Oregon to kick off the New Year.  Their gripe appears to be the Federal Government’s pesky grazing regulations interfering with their “right” to earn a profit off government land.[1]  Gonna’ be a showdown at the last chance corral I guess.

Now I imagine Bundy and the boys don’t take a liken’ to Wall Street bankers any more than they do to the Feds.  But in this instance, the bankers could help Bundy a lot, and maybe save his life.

TransCanada, sponsor of the now dead Keystone XL Pipeline and like Bundy no doubt, also dependent on preferred contractual access to public lands, shows the way.  President Obama lobbed a final nail in the coffin by vetoing the pipeline and more recently by formally rejecting the project.  But the deed was already done by the Saudis who killed it by unleashing a torrent of oil supply on the market, collapsing oil prices, and ending the economic viability of Canada’s grotesque Tar Sands and the need for the pipeline in the first place.  In fact TransCanada had already withdrawn the plan from consideration.

However, that didn’t stop TransCanada from now suing the United States of America for $15 billion in damages over Obama’s decision that the XL Pipeline was not in the interest of the United States, including our “security, safety, and environment.”

“TransCanada has been unjustly deprived of the value of its multibillion-dollar investment by the U.S. administration’s action,” the company said in a statement after Obama formally rejected the planned pipeline prior to the Paris Climate meeting, timed to bolster what he hopes will be his legacy as a leader on climate.

The XL Pipeline decision was effected through a time-honored democratic process enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Some agree with the decision, some don’t.  But that’s not the point.  The question is, on what basis can a foreign company sue the U.S. government over a policy decision, putting American taxpayers at risk for $15 billion in this case?  The answer: by invoking the North American Free Trade Agreement and its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clause.  This clause, as I previously explained here and here, about the contentious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement now awaiting approval by Congress, amounts to a veritable “trading away of our sovereignty.”  The TransCanada suit proves the point, and it’s not the first such suit challenging a nation’s sovereignty.  TPP will open up this insanity to 13 countries and economic activity representing 40% of world GDP.

My advice to Bundy and his buddies holed up in Eastern Oregon facing a cold winter? Buy a ranch in Canada.  Hire Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan to advise on a “tax inversion” in which using a legal slight of hand the Canadian ranch buys the Bundy ranch but Bundy remains in control of the combined operations (see the recent Pfizer inversion for details).  Then sue the United States Government for $15 billion under the ISDS mechanism of NAFTA claiming the BLM grazing regulations interfere with their right to make a profit on their investment.  This gets the issue away from the annoying U.S. government and into the hands of a three-person extrajudicial tribunal to determine the outcome of the case.  Sweet.  In the meantime, stand down, holster your guns, and thus, stay alive to fight another day.  You can always ammo up later if the tribunal lets you down.

Oh, and if Bundy doesn’t have the cash to buy the Canadian ranch, no problem.  There are a number of tougher than Bundy (no guns required) hedge funds that will be all too happy to lend money into a lawsuit and then corrupt the judicial process by bribing the lawmakers (sorry exercising their rights to free speech under Citizens United) to make a buck.  For details, see the current battle in Puerto Rico where these hedge funds are using their campaign contribution derived power to influence legislators over the decision to refuse Puerto Rico access to the normal and civilized protections afforded other borrowers including Donald Trump – but not our children if they take out a student loan – under the bankruptcy code.  No doubt these hedge funds will have some crafty ideas for how to swing a simple three-person tribunal.  For a mere twenty percent of the profits plus expenses, it’s a deal!

Insanity is the new normal in America.


 

[1] The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) policies have issues worthy of debate, but turning land over to folks like Bundy to manage without restrictions is not the solution.

Comment<Back
  • Brian Nelson

    It’s a fright. It would appear that MIT intellects have diverted their brain power into finagling world commerce one free trade agreement at a time….. It is ironic, I would like to see President Obama now defend his TPP catapult in light of the suit brought by the dirty tar people of Trans Canada under NAFTA…. he can’t do that, “Nah, that can’t happen” thing anymore. Little embarrassing actually. Lot tragic.

  • http://TedHowardNZ.com/ Ted Howard

    Beautifully written John. On target.
    The foxes have control of the hen house.

  • Robin Boies

    In contrast to the Bundy’s, there is in the West, if you have knowledge of the West beyond CNN, collaborative groups that have found common ground in the radical center of the western land paradox of mixed private/public ownership.

    These groups and organizations work for ecological sustainability, economic resilience, and diverse social/cultural preservation. You might want to look into groups like Sustainable Northwest, The Quivera Coalition, or even our small but successful twenty year old Shoesole Management Team, and our more recently formed Stewardship Alliance of Northeast Elko (SANE).

    Don’t judge western lands ranchers by the news coverage of the Bundy’s. There are some of us working together with our State and Federal partners to better the public and private ranges, our communities and our families who inhabit these lands. Robin Boies